You Said, We Did
How your voice has made a difference
This page provides an opportunity to see the valuable feedback received from students across a wide range of communication channels, and to see what the OU has done in response.
Choose a topic from the drop-down list below to see how students can have an impact on their university experience and be empowered to help shape the University. Next time you are asked to give your opinion, you know that the OU is taking this feedback seriously and will respond.
You said...
You wanted advice about the structure and terminology of mathematical enquiry.
We did...
We produce a document for the study site addressing this need.
Mathematics and Statistics
Posted on:
You said...
You wanted a “module choice” event for level 2 and 3 modules
We did...
We have started plans to a level 3 module choice event in July 2021. There is less choice at level 2, so we will consider the success of a level 3 event before expanding this.
Posted on:
You said...
You wanted more students to leave module reviews
We did...
We emailed all students towards the end of their module in June 2020 requesting this and also pointing to resources to support their preparation for their next module.
Posted on:
You said...
You wished the library would hold sufficient electronic copies of MSc texts
We did...
We followed this up with the library, but not all publishers currently provide electronic copies of the books.
Posted on:
You said...
You want the ability to install module software locally, but also appreciated online access
We did...
We took this into account in the planning of new modules, specifically M348 (Applied statistical modelling) and MST374 (Computational applied mathematics), both planned for first presentation in October 2022.
Posted on:
You said...
You wanted us to stop sending DVDs in module materials
We did...
We have phased these out.
Posted on:
You said...
You wanted more “early start”s to modules
We did...
We provided early materials for each module on the Study Site.
Posted on:
You said...
You wanted a student-led forum for general mathematical discussions.
We did...
We set this up on the Study Site, with support of the Board of Studies student representatives.
Posted on:
You said...
The assessment on some of the 24-hour remote exams that replaced invigilated exams were unfair because some students could afford to spend at most 3 hours on preparing the answers while others might have spent the whole day on perfecting their answers.
We did...
We agree that the communication on the determination of exam grades was incomplete and potentially disadvantaging some students on a small number of modules. We helped the University design a new appeals process for remote exams, offered all students on affected modules to re-sit their exam in June 2021, and provided a fast-track alternative assessment for those with an urgent need to review their grades.
Posted on:
You said...
The learning curve for Python use in SXPS288 is very steep, particularly for those who have not studied SM123 beforehand.
We did...
We have prepared the self-contained resource Python for Physical Sciences which provides an introduction to the basics of Python that is accessible to physical sciences students with no prior knowledge of programming. The resource is open to OU students at all times, with tailored forum support by tutors at certain periods of the year.
Posted on:
Latest Opportunities
Student Voice Week – Shape Your OU (15–21 November)
At home / online
Sign up to the Student Voice and Student Consultation mailing list
At home / online
